Видео

makes absolute sense

Very cool thank you.

Now do it for eevee 😅

Some tutorials from this list are for After Effects, Maya and even for UE... But it was worth the effort

I always export 100% PNG compression 💀 What about HEIC format though? It’s very small and Apple uses it for wallpapers and such but it isn’t used in other areas because of compatability

the floor is wet. my man spat truths

Is it true that exr doesn't have filmic or agx color space like jpeg and png?

Baking tut please 😊

Jesus loves you please teach me how to watch 120 million videos i will pray for you amen

Oh my days! You deserve a million subs! Please continue what you're doing! It helps a lot!

Fantastic! Is it possible with Python (which I don't know how to write) to write a script that would add this light on to to menu options (sun, point, area, spot). Like I said I don't know Python but if I know it's possible I will figure it out :)

Hello @Robin Squares, can i use this setup for commercial by making it as an addon?

JPEG can't do very slow gradients because there is quantization in YCbCr domain, which is only removed with the new JpegLi codec which no software has. You can see a similar effect in the video encoding on the chart scenes here. They show a grey ellipse with blocky borders instead of a smooth blob. Lossless EXR compression is better/faster than PNG. But it's a very complex format and only pro tools support it fully.

THANK YOU!

One issue I've experienced with using exr is that when it's saved in blender, it usually doesn't look like the png file when loaded into a photo manipulation program like krita. This is usually cos of the color management (AGX or Filmic)

awesome thanks!!!

Dude, phenomenal video. This is what RUclips content should be.

For the web, you can use WebP until AVIF become widely supported. Both are much better than PNG & JPG

How can I solve the linear problem? When I import the EXR into PHOTOSHOP, several colors are modified and it becomes more saturated and bright

welp. Im subscribed and liked the vid, i just started my blender journey ill see you in about a year

Hey there! Quick question: do you have any insight on how we go about separating (for baking) a texture that has the decals applied after the Principled BSDF? I'm used to baking the separate texture maps by what's plugged into the BSDF node, but not sure how to include the decals on the texture since they are added with a mix shader. TIA!

This is gold, thank you 😉

I find it very amusing that the slide about bit-depth had the gradient all stepped to bits both literal and figurative 😂

How can I mix the roughness as well or is it already added when applied to the base

Ive tried for days to put graffiti on a displaced wall and this solved it

Remove the 5 point star in the intro , is satanic you should not use it and no one should see it , hell is real I warn you atheism is political propaganda, believe only in Jesus Christ.

I'm curious to know how did you gain this knowledge, like the mist and evee trick to emulate fog? Is that something you experiment with until you have a good result or something you gain from some sources? Because I'd like to get a deep knowledge about these stuff and don't know where I can find that

I am looking for tutorials and courses on lighting. It's very hard to find. I've done the course by Gleb Alexandrov Any other videos on lighting that you know about @robinsquares?

Hey! but importing that exr File in Photoshop makes it look weird

the majority of what i actually learned in blender came from discovering it on my own time. tutorials teach you how to do something and even tho a lot of videos tell you what each small adjustment does, it wont get stuck in your head. so, as i did, i learned blender from playing around with the software, googling if i really didnt know what something does. that way i made more progress than any tutorial ever did for me. you learn wich features to use for what and thats a skill you just cant learn through tutorials. ive been at this for 2 years on and off and im by no means good at it. but im getting there. improving bit by bit. if you have passion, you dont need tutorials. you only need yourself.

Vent, hva faen. Du er jo Norsk! Fint å se noen andre som er mega fan av Arrimus, han er den beste karen jeg noen gang har sett når det kommer til hard surface. Han pleide å ha en rå video på hvordan å lage en kukri machete back in the day som dessverre har forsvunnet.

to be honest buggy, not close to realism u have to touch it a lot but it's something u can do with floor generator for free... i wasted 12 € definitely not reccomended

RIP people taking this misleading video for granted.

I used to hate and avoid exr files because of the ridiculously large file size. Thanks so much for this tip!

Vary cool technique! Thanks for sharing!

Very much appriciate your effort. The whole series is a must See and very well done.

In terms of topology i can recommend two channels, both are very precise maximalists. One of them is Aryan. He speaks very fast, but he says only the point, therefore everybody can learn a lot from him. The other youtuber is Ian McGlasham. He also shows how to make good topology and how to avoid amaterur-ish mistakes. Besides that, both of them are very good teachers, whose only goal is to give back the vast knowledge they has acquired over time. Unfortunately I cannot say all of this about Josh Gambell. Most of the time he is just trying to sell his own addons.

thank you

So in 3 months you grew from 65 to 14k subs. Well deserved, because this tutorial is awesome. While mesh-based decals certainly have their important use cases, I also mainly wanted to go with a method, that wouldn't generate z-fighting or have a visible distance between decal and surface. This is going to be very helpful!

I have a question regarding View Layers. I'm trying to find a way to make a View Layer a multilayer EXR with only Utility Passes (Z, Mist, Normal, Position, etc.). The problem is when I render Z or Mist in each View Layer with cutouts, the passes get cutout aswell. What's the workaround for this? How can I render a Z/Mist Pass cleanly without having to render through Cycles again?

Goodbye Cinema 4D

Size these days doesn't matter in most cases. PNG is still the most compatable and reliable format. MOST reglar programs don't support DWA or EXR etc. PNG of JPG or svg are the primary formats I use.

Did he just say 120m videos!!

Too many tools i use are optimized for PNG with alpha functionality. If I had to do JPG then i would need to do constant conversations between programs. Not ideal and time wasting.

I'm not sure the explanation at 0:56 is correct at all 9 bit is twice as big as 8, 10 bit is twice as big as 9 every single bit double the amount so 16 isn't twice as big, it's 64 times as big and 32 bit is 256 times bigger biggest 8 bit in is 128 i think biggest 32 bit int is 2'147'483'647 and biggest 64 bit int is 9'223'372'036'854'775'808

womp womp

firstly interesting takes, this is a complex and very nuanced subject and its awesome your delving into it. I'm a pipeline engineer and I've had to deal with this subject for nearly 2 decades now, and I have a few insights. So there are 2 sorts of image formats in CG, production formats and review formats. **Production** Generally production formats contain high bit-depth data with lossless compression and are stored in specialized colorspaces (usually ACES, or some form of LOG) The purpose of these formats is store high fidelity data which can be read/written by multiple departments without data loss. For example files being sent from color grading to comp. **Review** Generally review formats are lower bit depth and stored in colorspaces like REC-709 or SRGB. The purpose of these formats is to store data viewable by clients or in review sessions. These files are compact, fast to load and view, and most programs can display them correctly without any additional configuration. They'll never be graded so their lossy compression never affects their appearance too much. The review format discards an enormous about of data which our eyes are less capable of distinguishing, so the file size is lower, but if you try to grade these formats you instantly see banding, and blowouts. JPEG, DWAA and DWAB all use a type of compression called DCT or Discreet Cosine Transform. This form of compression doesn't store the image in pixels, it breaks it into blocks and uses pre-defined overlapping cosines to provide a near approximation. I believe some studios use DWAA/B in production but they're doing it knowing that they're accepting the lossyness (on one CG film I worked on we used it without issue) DCT is a VERY lossy compression format that relies on how bad our eyes are at discerning luminescence differences in shadows, and color variations. Its fantastic for the review but terrible if you every want to use the image as a production texture, or input for compositing. These describe lossy compression really well. ruclips.net/video/Q2aEzeMDHMA/видео.html ruclips.net/video/swoIPD7EvEw/видео.html For color textures 16-bit linear is king, but most people can live with PNG. For data textures like displacement / normals you should use a lossless format with high bit depth or you will see artifacts. (especially when you overdrive them) I don't know if cycles has a preferred image format, but most render engines use mip mapped and memory mapped images to improve performance. TLDR: - JPEG is for the web, its fantastic for that but sucks for eveything else. dont use it for production files. - Use EXR Scanline if you can afford it, and DWA/B if you cant, use PNG if you have no other option.

I wish I could destroy that like button ! Good stuff man !!

Great! - you earned a new subscriber :-)